Jones' Jewish Advertisers
It is interesting that a few years ago, I was pointing out that Jones was deliberately obfuscating the Jewish connection to 911. With this new revelation of Jewish advertisers who support the Jones broadcast, we may soon understand why he continues to direct blame towards "rich-white-guys-with-Nazi-bloodlines", while simultaneously carrying water for Israel in the face of a mountain of evidence showing Jewish / Zionist / Israeli culpability in the 911 terror attack.
He had access to the same info as I, and yet refused to discuss it on air, even at the behest of his listeners / callers.
I also remember the criticism I received on website forums;
"Peter Schaenk is jealous of Alex...Peter Schaenk is a racist, Peter Schaenk is cointelpro working for the NWO, that is why he is attacking Alex...Don't attack Alex, he does a lot of good work...He is a stepping stone to awareness of the NWO...We need to be united, by attacking Alex you are bringing divisiveness to the Patriot movement...Peter Schaenk is a neo con, that is why he attacks Jones...etc.”
Honest and accurate reporting
Time has shown that my reporting was honest and accurate from the beginning, and yet to this day, I still receive the same criticism I received when I first pointed out the duplicity of RBN, Jones and the Patriotard movement.
One "Troll" on this site said I had a history of disrupting networks I am affiliated with after a "falling out".
What would the "Troll" expect me to do after finding out the treachery that exists within the group I am working with?
Continue my affiliation with the group, pretend they are a bunch of "swell guys" and never make the public aware of the Byzantine workings behind the scenes, designed to swindle and mislead the listeners?
I may have a “history” of disrupting networks I am affiliated with, that's in the eye of the beholder, but at least I report the truth. The information I have brought to the public is honest and accurate. That’s my only concern. I am not here to win a popularity contest with a bunch of guys who should be working at a carnival side show.
Conflict Of Interest
Some have tried to discredit Jones by attacking his wife's Jewish ancestry. This doesn't sit well with most people, as it appears to get "too personal". By drawing attention to Alex Jones’ advertisers, the high ground has been gained in this debate. People can no longer criticize the information as a personal attack of Jones. The revelation of "Jewish advertisers" is public knowledge. Advertisers do have influence over the subject matter of the Alex Jones show, as they do with any commercial broadcast network that accepts their money.
There is definitely a logical argument that could be made showing a "conflict of interest" between Jones' advertisers and the subject matter that Jones "will / will not" cover.
"Israel could not carry out 911...I know, I have done the research..." (Alex Jones)
He is "OWNED" by Jews. If he speaks out effectively against the state of Israel, or calls for an honest investigation of the holocaust, he will lose a vast majority of his advertising dollars. If you factor this in with his claim that "Israel could not carry out 911", it should lead one to seriously question the validity of any information that Jones presents.
It’s time others hold Jones’ "feet to the fire" and ask about his Jewish advertisers and his refusal to honestly discuss the Jewish culpability in 911 and the New World Order.
"From Italy, Pavelic was smuggled on the Rat Lines to Argentina, where he served as a security adviser to president Juan Peron (Peron granted entry visas to 34,000 Croats, many of them associated with the Ustashe and Nazi supporters)."
Why should that be surprising? Peron had the deepest admiration for Fascist Italy.
Posted by: Igor Alexander | May 22, 2009 at 10:07 PM
"Gowen said another mission included, at the request of British intelligence, surveillance of Irgun and Lehi activists..."
Tsk, tsk ... those naughty anti-Semites from British intelligence.
Posted by: Igor Alexander | May 22, 2009 at 10:17 PM
Here's Jonathan Levy's history of postings (all of them anti-Catholic) at the JTA (Jewish Telegraphic Agency) website:
http://jta.org/user/profile/27934
Posted by: Igor Alexander | May 22, 2009 at 10:29 PM
"Igor, you do know that John Perkins is a Jew, right?"
ZOG, I was going to drop this, 'cause I think there's enough infighting in this "movement" as it is, but I have a hard time figuring out why you wrote what you did above.
You said this guy was a Jew. You didn't say you *suspected* him of being a Jew, you said he *was* a Jew, as if this were a well-known and well-established fact. When I asked you how you knew... complete silence.
The truth is, there's not a shred of evidence that John Perkins is a Jew. You know this, which is why you haven't offered any.
So just what are you trying to pull here? You've done what seems to be some good research, which is why I hesitated to call you on this, but I'm starting to think you're some kind of a troll who thinks WNs are a bunch of dumbasses that'll swallow anything.
When someone won't name the Jew, like Alex Jones, I get suspicious, but when someone spends all his time calling people Jews without any evidence, that's also suspicious. Crap like this just reinforces the idea that anti-Semites are a bunch of paranoid kooks who see Jews behind every tree.
Posted by: Igor Alexander | May 23, 2009 at 10:38 PM
Like I said to you before, Igor, if anything, I UNDER-estimate the number of Jews in high places in American society.
"Perkins" is a common Jewish surname. I'm surprised you didn't know that.
Now, knowing that "Perkins" is a common Jewish surname, use Google Images to find a picture of John Perkins and see what he looks like. Did you even bother to do this? I bet you didn't.
http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&um=1&sa=1&q=%22john+perkins%22&btnG=Search+Images&aq=f&oq=
Posted by: Z.O.G. | May 23, 2009 at 11:52 PM
Icke says Sitchen is a shapeshifter and this drives the judaic Jordan Maxwell bonkers.
Posted by: roscoe | May 25, 2009 at 02:13 PM
Jones is the Anti-Truther, covering up and confusing who the guilty parties actually are! This is his job and they pay him well! If you see him in public, CRACK HIS JAW A GOOD ONE, WOULD YOU?
Posted by: Homey-G | June 04, 2009 at 12:34 AM
Alex "Arabs own Hollywood" Jones is a shill.
100+ books in full text online about the global jew mafia.
http://jewise.wordpress.com/
Posted by: Hoff | June 04, 2009 at 01:07 PM
Lets put it this way, if Alex Jones was a bird he'd be a mockingbird......and lets not forget MK Ultra - violet light, I believe thats stilll going.
Posted by: zinc | June 04, 2009 at 03:03 PM
If Jones was a bird he'd have to be a turkey.
Posted by: Wolf | June 06, 2009 at 02:57 PM
Yeah, a BIG FAT turkey.
:-D
Posted by: Z.O.G. | June 07, 2009 at 09:07 PM
"Did you even bother to do this? I bet you didn't."
Vavavoom! John Perkins is hawt:
http://www.myspace.com/johnperkinsphotographer
All kidding aside, I checked out Perkins's site before calling bullshit on your claim. He looks WASP to me.
Here's what Wikipedia has to say about the name Perkins:
"The name is of Welsh origin from Perthyn, relative or belonging to a particular person or family, and also thought to be the Anglicized form of Peredur, from Medieval Welsh. It is also found throughout mid and southern England."
Posted by: Igor Alexander | June 09, 2009 at 09:32 PM
"Icke says Sitchen is a shapeshifter..."
Does he really? Icke used to promote Sitchin's stuff.
Posted by: Igor Alexander | June 09, 2009 at 09:38 PM
I have heard in the past that jones has filled his pockets with plenty of cash.He will probly do a tokyo Rose from the Camens when the s hits the fan. Shake
Posted by: shake | June 11, 2009 at 09:15 AM
Interesting admission on Jones's show today from one of his regulars, Bob Chapman: according to Bob, he was close friends with Leon Degrelle and said he provided the funding to print one of Degrelle's books. Degrelle was the leader of the Belgian fascist-Catholic Rexist Party and was the man Hitler supposedly regarded like a son.
Yet more evidence that Jones and his buddies know perfectly well about the Jewish Problem but are deliberately holding back.
Posted by: Igor Alexander | July 03, 2009 at 11:35 AM
Bob Chapman is most likely a Jew.
1.) "Chapman" is a stereotypical Jewish name
2.) He has a stereotypical New York Jewish accent.
3.) He was in the brokerage and precious metals business for thirty years, which are very Jewey professions.
Three strikes and you're out, Bob Chapman.
;-)
Posted by: Z.O.G. | July 03, 2009 at 07:35 PM
How did I know you were going to say that. :-)
I at first assumed he was a jew because of his New York accent, but FWIW, he claims to be the descendent of Italian immigrants.
Wish I owned a copy of Degrelle's book so I could check, but I strongly suspect that Chapman is distorting its contents to fit his and Jonestein's stupid theories. Degrelle was a proud Nazi to the end of his days and I doubt he ever wrote that Hitler was an Illuminati frontman.
Posted by: Igor Alexander | July 03, 2009 at 09:04 PM
Here's the book Chapman was talking about:
Hitler, Born At Versailles
Posted by: Igor Alexander | July 03, 2009 at 10:15 PM
"Degrelle was a proud Nazi to the end of his days and I doubt he ever wrote that Hitler was an Illuminati frontman."
Yeah, especially since there's no such thing as the "Illuminat" to begin with. It's just a made-up Paytriotard term designed to deflect attention away from the Jews.
Posted by: Z.O.G. | July 03, 2009 at 10:25 PM
"...but FWIW, he claims to be the descendent of Italian immigrants."
Italian immigrants named "Chapman"?
LOL :-D
Okay, whatever you say, Bob Chapman.
Posted by: Z.O.G. | July 03, 2009 at 10:27 PM